The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOSTA ILIC
____________
Appeal 2007-1740
Application 09/726,776
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: July 24, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and JEAN R.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-31. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
Appellant’s claimed invention relates to the magnification of a display
of a signal waveform in which a virtual magnification symbol is positioned
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013