The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte SHEN BUSWELL, RIO T. RIVAS, MEHRGAN KHAVARI, PAUL TEMPLIN, MARK H. MACKENZIE, and CONRAD JENSSEN ______________ Appeal 2007-1747 Application 10/061,492 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: May 30, 2007 _______________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 45 in the Final Action mailed August 5, 2004. Subsequent to the Final Action, Appellants cancelled claims 1 through 42, 44, and 45 and submitted claims 46 through 48 in the Amendment filed October 5, 2004, which amendment was entered in the 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013