The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROLAND DILLEY, RICHARD PAUL BELDAM and WILLI J. SMITH ____________ Appeal 2007-1750 Application 11/057,917 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: August 29, 2007 ____________ Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, ANTON FETTING, and JOSEPH FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges. WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF CASE This is an appeal from the Examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1-7, 9, 20 and 21 as amended after Final Rejection. Claim 8 has been cancelled. Claims 10-19 and 22 stand withdrawn from consideration. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013