The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MORGAN HUA and JOSE MACHUCA
__________
Appeal 2007-1762
Application 10/218,245
Technology Center 2100
__________
Decided: August 28, 2007
__________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JAY P. LUCAS, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 2, 8, 14, 19-23, 25-33, 35-38, 40-45 and 47.1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We REVERSE.
1 To consolidate the issues on appeal, Appellants have withdrawn claim 14
from consideration in this appeal (Br. 4). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed
as to this claim.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013