The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PETER KIAN-HOON HO and
VICTOR ALEXANDER LIFTON
________________
Appeal 2007-1764
Application 10/391,320
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: September 10, 2007
________________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1, 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, and 26-32.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6.
1 The Examiner indicates that claim 10 has been canceled (Answer 3).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013