Ex Parte Strongin et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                   Ex parte GEOFREY S. STRONGIN,                                             
                             BRIAN C. BARNES, AND RODNEY SCHMIDT                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1773                                                
                                          Application 10/107,776                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 27, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,                                           
                and JAY P. LUCAS,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of                    
                claims 29, 30, 32, 36, 37, and 39 to 51.  We have jurisdiction under 35                      
                U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013