The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEOFREY S. STRONGIN,
BRIAN C. BARNES, AND RODNEY SCHMIDT
____________
Appeal 2007-1773
Application 10/107,776
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: July 27, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of
claims 29, 30, 32, 36, 37, and 39 to 51. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013