The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RUDOLF BENDIXEN and MICHAEL BURCHETT __________ Appeal 2007-1780 Application 10/340,127 Technology Center 2600 __________ Decided: October 22, 2007 _________ Before LEE E. BARRETT, JAY P. LUCAS, and ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges. COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 7, 16, 17, and 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013