Appeal 2007-1788
Application 09/766,032
having a float buoyancy that is greater than the spring constant that controls
its switch sensitivity.
In sum, I agree that Riead describes a bobber according to claim 22.
However, I do not agree that Riead describes all of the limitations of
claims 18 and 19. Therefore, in my view, the rejection of claims 18 and 19
should be reversed.
lbg
CARL L. JOHNSON
JACOBSON AND JOHNSON
SUITE 285
ONE WEST WATER STREET
ST. PAUL MO 55107-2080
16
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Last modified: September 9, 2013