Appeal 2007-1798
Application 10/347,666
not persuaded by Appellants’ arguments which are based on the Chen
Declaration.
On reflection, we find that the Examiner has met his burden of
presenting a prima facie case of obviousness which Appellants have not
rebutted. Accordingly, we affirm the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Wehrmann. Claim 2-13 and 63 fall together
with claim 1.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we affirm the rejection of record.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Ssc
JOHN B. HARDAWAY, III
NEXSEN PRUET JACOBS & POLLARD, LLC
P.O. BOX 10107, FED. STA.
GREENVILLE, SC 29603-0107
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013