The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOICHIRO INOUE,
TOYOTAKA KINOSHITA
And MASAO ISHIDA
____________
Appeal 2007-1803
Application 10/716,512
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 7, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's
decision rejecting claims 1-7. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
We AFFIRM.
Appellants claim a microalloyed steel separable by fracture splitting at
low temperatures which comprises particular constituents and amounts
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013