The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not
binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TAMAKI NISHIKORI
And RON DAVIS
________________
Appeal 2007-1804
Application 10/885,053
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: July 30, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and JEFFREY T.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 28 and 30-32.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2006).
1 The subject matter of claims 34-38 has been allowed (Br. 5). The subject
matter of claim 33 has been objected to for being dependent upon a rejected
claim (Br. 5).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013