The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOMOHIKO KOGURE and AKIRA KURAMORI ____________ Appeal 2007-1854 Application 10/920,345 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 27, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, and 5-10. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013