The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROGELIO ROBLES and HECTOR RODRIGUEZ-AVILES
____________
Appeal 2007-1877
Application 09/887,306
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 19, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and HOWARD B.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1-5, 7-9, 11-24, 26-29, 31, 34-37, and 39. Claims 6, 10, 25, 30, 32,
33, 38, and 40 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b).
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013