Ex Parte Goto et al - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                            
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                             ________________                                                   
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                             ________________                                                   
                                   Ex parte HARUHIRO HARRY GOTO,                                                
                            WILLIAM R. HARSHBARGER, and KAM S. LAW                                              
                                             ________________                                                   
                                              Appeal 2007-1884                                                  
                                           Application 10/329,205                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                               
                                             ________________                                                   
                                           Decided:  June 13, 2007                                              
                                             ________________                                                   
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                      
                CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8 and 10-12.                        
                Claim 8 is illustrative:                                                                        
                8. A process for selectively etching silicon from a workpiece without                           
                etching silicon oxide or silicon nitride, comprising the simultaneous steps of:                 
                       holding a workpiece comprising silicon on a susceptor within a                           
                chamber interior;                                                                               
                                                                                                               



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013