The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte DWIGHT W. SCHWARK and DREW SPEER ________________ Appeal 2007-1890 Application 10/444,624 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ________________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-8, and 18, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a multilayer film comprising a first outer layer of a blend of a polymer and an antifog agent; an internal layer comprising an oxygen scavenger; a second outer layerPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013