The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KATSUYA SEKI,
HIDEO GOTO, and
SHINJI SAITO
____________
Appeal 2007-1898
Application 10/360,622
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 11, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4-8, 10, and 11, which are
the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013