Ex Parte OKAMOTO et al - Page 10

                Appeal 2007-1902                                                                                  
                Application 09/398,006                                                                            
                respect to cord layer axial width based on Farnsworth’s three-cord layer                          
                construction, all of which possible designs are illustrated as alternative                        
                embodiments in Gaudin Figs. 6-11, and Farnsworth discloses a high cord                            
                inclination angle cord layer radially outside a pair of low cord inclination                      
                angle cord layers which is the cord inclination angle arrangement claimed                         
                (id. 11-13).  The Examiner contends Kohno suggests using a coating rubber                         
                having a high modulus in the outermost cord layer and “does not teach that                        
                such a high modulus coating rubber is specific to a circumferential belt                          
                layer,” wherein the benefits disclosed are “directly analogous to the                             
                benefits” disclosed in the Specification (id. 14, citing Kohno col. 4,                            
                ll. 47-55, and Specification 9:21-23).                                                            
                       The Examiner contends, with respect to the examples and data                               
                beginning on page 54 of the Specification,                                                        
                       only Table 2 provides a relationship between the axial widths of                           
                       the layers and the improvement in cut resistance.  In this                                 
                       instance, the cut resistance is actually a maximum in Example                              
                       15 in which the outermost [cord layer] 3B has a width of                                   
                       110 mm and the middle [cord layer] 2B has a width of 150 mm                                
                       – this embodiment though, does not satisfy the claimed ratio of                            
                       the outermost [cord layer] having a width that is greater than                             
                       the width of the middle [cord layer] (1.0-1.2 times as wide).                              
                       Examples 17 and 18 of Table 2 are the only constructions that                              
                       are commensurate in scope with the claims.  These example,                                 
                       though, are not persuasive in establishing an unexpected result                            
                       for the claimed construction.  In particular, the cut resistance is                        
                       measured beneath a groove at a position equal to 100 mm (Page                              
                       58).  In comparing Examples 17 and 18 to Comparative                                       
                       Examples 7 and 8, one would expect an increase in cut                                      
                       resistance (at a position beneath a groove) because the                                    
                       outermost [cord layer] has a width smaller than and equal to the                           
                       groove positioning.                                                                        


                                                      10                                                          

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013