Ex Parte Kim et al - Page 1

                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                    
                                           precedent of the Board.                                             

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                            Ex parte SEONG-BONG KIM and DONG-UK CHOI                                           
                                              Appeal 2007-1904                                                 
                                           Application 10/790,081                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                        Decided: September 18, 2007                                            

                Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                      
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               

                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                           
                Examiner’s final rejection of claims 34 through 36.  Claims 27 through 33                      
                and 37 through 39, the other claims pending in the above-identified                            
                application, were allowed or indicated to be allowable if they are rewritten to                
                include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.                   
                We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6.                                                

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013