The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEONG-BONG KIM and DONG-UK CHOI
____________
Appeal 2007-1904
Application 10/790,081
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 18, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 34 through 36. Claims 27 through 33
and 37 through 39, the other claims pending in the above-identified
application, were allowed or indicated to be allowable if they are rewritten to
include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013