Appeal 2007-1920 Application 09/731,437 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Randy Oxley (“Appellant”) seeks our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 6-10, 13, 21, 22, 24-26, 28, and 29. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). We reverse.1 THE INVENTION Appellant claims a holder adapted to support a stringed bow in a generally horizontal position outwardly from a hunter’s body at a position below the hunter’s waist (Specification 7:18-21). Claim 1, the only independent claim, is representative of the subject matter on appeal. 1. A holder adapted to support a stringed bow in a generally horizontal position outwardly from a hunter's body at a position below the hunter's waist comprising: a support member; a spacing member combined with the support member and extending generally inwardly and upwardly therefrom; and an engagement member combined with said spacing member and being disposed generally above and inward from the support member; the support member comprising an inward section and an outward section, said sections forming an upwardly concave surface. 1 Only those arguments actually made by Appellant have been considered in this decision. Arguments which Appellant could have made but chose not to make in the Briefs have not been considered and are deemed to be waived. See 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (2004). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013