Appeal 2007-1925
Application 09/391,869
and teaches an arrangement for loose leaf pockets (Dick, p. 1,
ll. 16-25).
15. Dick teaches and displays a pocket that is stitched or otherwise
suitably secured to a fly leaf along three of its four edges to define a
closed pocket with an opening along its fourth edge (Dick, p. 1,
ll. 54-60, Fig. 1).
16. Dick acknowledges that the pocket may be secured by any suitable
means (Dick, p. 1, l. 90).
17. Ruebens describes an improved photo album in which a transparent
cover is attached to three edges of each display page to form one or
more pockets (Ruebens, col. 2, ll. 52-54, col. 3, ll. 40-42, Fig. 1).
18. The transparent cover is attached to the display page by lines of
attachment by any convenient means such as various well-known
adhesives (Ruebens, col. 3, ll. 53-55).
19. Figure 1 of Ruebens shows that the transparent cover is attached to the
display page by lines of attachment along its upper and lower edges
and also via an additional line of attachment parallel to the upper and
lower edges to separate two pockets formed between the transparent
cover and the display page (Ruebens, Fig. 1, col. 4, ll. 39-46).
20. The prior art differs from the disputed claim limitations only in its
failure to explicitly state a pocket insert construction “rendering the
insert passable through a copier or printer in sequence with a sheet of
paper.”
11
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013