Appeal 2007-1944
Application 10/631,894
a secondary cell which stores power generated by
the fuel cell,
wherein the fuel cell system is disposed at a side of a lens
of the camera, and
the secondary cell is disposed adjacent to the fuel cell.
(Br. at 15; paragraphing, indentation, and italics added.)
Independent claims 26 and 28 are similar, but are drawn to a portable
telephone and a portable terminal, respectively. Independent claim 51 is
drawn to a fuel cell system largely as recited in claim 25, but the flexible
sheet member is not recited. Claims 52–56 depend from claim 51.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art as evidence of
unpatentability:
Prasad U.S. 2003/0,082,427 A1 May 1, 2003
Ohtani U.S. 6,118,949 Sep. 12, 2000
Peterson U.S. 3,439,596 Apr. 22, 1969
Shioya U.S. 6,916,565 B2 Jul. 12, 2005
Lonka U.S. 6,308,084 B1 Oct. 23, 2001
Bateman U.S. 5,909,818 Jun. 8, 1999
Faris U.S. 6,558,825 B1 May 6, 2003
B. Findings of Fact
The following findings of fact and any set out in the Discussion are
supported by a preponderance of the evidence of record. To the extent any
finding of fact is a conclusion of law, it should be treated as such.
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013