Appeal 2007-1944 Application 10/631,894 FURTHER ORDERED that the rejection of claims 51, 52, and 55–57 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combined teachings of Prasad and Shioya is AFFIRMED; FURTHER ORDERED that the rejection of claims 53 and 54 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combined teachings of Prasad, Shioya, and Bateman is AFFIRMED; FURTHER ORDERED that the rejection of claim 58 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combined teachings of Prasad, Shioya, and Faris is AFFIRMED; FURTHER ORDERED that the rejection of claim 59 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combined teachings of Prasad, Shioya, and Faris is AFFIRMED; and FURTHER ORDERED that no time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, DC 20037 -19-Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Last modified: September 9, 2013