The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NATAN VISHLITZKY, HAIM KOPYLOVITZ,
HANA MORESHET and ADI OFER
_____________
Appeal 2007-1951
Application 10/120,016
Technology Center 2100
______________
Decided: September 26, 2007
_______________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS and ROBERT E.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002) of the final
rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 16, 22 through 28, 30, and 32
through 34. For the reasons stated infra, we will not sustain the Examiner’s
rejection of these claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013