The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN H. BLENDERMANN, ALAN RAY SUTTON,
ROBERT RAICER, L. MICHAEL ANDERSON, CLAYTON E. RUFF,
and WILLIAM G. KEFAUVER
____________
Appeal 2007-1958
Application 11/130,940
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 11, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ROBERT E. NAPPI,
and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1 through 37. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).
As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,
independent claim 1 is reproduced below:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013