Appeal 2007-1959
Application 10/039,789
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Because Appellants have failed to point to any error in the Examiner’s
position, we sustain the § 103 rejection with respect to claims 1 and 22-26,
and also with respect to claims 3, 6-8, 10-15, 18, 20, and 21, which are
argued together with claim 1 (Br. 14). Therefore, we sustain the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 rejection of claims 1, 3, 6-8, 10-15, 18, 20, 21, 23, and 26 over
Poulsen and Sundaresan, and of claims 22, 24, and 25 over Poulsen,
Sundaresan, and Hardwick.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 6-8, 10-15, 18,
and 20-26 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
KIS
TROP, PRUNER & HU, P. C.
1616 S. VOSS ROAD, SUITE 750
HOUSTON, TX 77057-2631
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013