Ex Parte Wood - Page 8

                Appeal 2007-1983                                                                             
                Application 09/800,366                                                                       
                                                                                                            
                would inherently occur during a “frame time” (i.e., the time required to                     
                obtain a complete image with improved sensitivity).5                                         
                      Even if we assume, without deciding, that only one pulse was applied                   
                to the infrared sensors for each preliminary measurement in Wood ‘149                        
                (e.g., in the manner shown in Figure 6 of Wood ‘419),6 such a technique                      
                would nonetheless effectively result in multiple pulses applied during the                   
                “frame time” as claimed since multiple preliminary measurements are                          
                conducted prior to averaging.  That is, each preliminary measurement (and                    
                their corresponding pulses) taken together effectively result in multiple                    
                sequential pulses during the “frame time” as claimed.                                        
                      For at least the foregoing reasons, Wood ‘149, considered with its                     
                incorporated Wood ‘419 disclosure, fully meets claims 1 and 13.                              
                Accordingly, the Examiner’s rejection of those claims is sustained.                          
                      Regarding claim 2, the scope and breadth of the claim does not                         
                preclude obtaining multiple complete images with increased sensitivity                       
                using the still camera of Wood ‘149.  As the Examiner indicates (Answer 4),                  
                Wood ‘149 teaches recording and displaying multiple still frame images                       
                (Wood ‘149, col. 1, ll. 55-58).  In our view, each complete, increased-                      
                                                                                                            
                5 Under this interpretation, we find that the “frame time” in Wood ‘149                      
                actually meets the narrower recitation of “frame time” recited in claim 13 --                
                an interpretation which likewise meets the broader recitation of the term in                 
                claim 1.                                                                                     
                6 Although Wood ‘419 in Figure 6 shows multiple bias pulses over time, we                    
                presume that the time between these pulses is the “frame time” as the term is                
                defined in the Specification and recited in claim 13.  That is, we presume                   
                that Wood ‘419 applies one pulse during the frame time -- a teaching                         
                commensurate with the admitted prior art shown in Figure 4 of the present                    
                application.  See also Br. 32 (noting that Figure 4 of the present application               
                “corresponds” to Figure 6 of Wood ‘419).                                                     
                                                     8                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013