Ex Parte Shannon - Page 2

               Appeal  2007-1998                                                                            
               Application 09/997,829                                                                       
                                            INTRODUCTION                                                    
                      The claims are directed to an implantable drug eluting device.  Claim                 
               103 is illustrative:                                                                         
                      103.  An implantable drug eluting device that has a compressed                        
               undeployed diameter and an expanded deployed diameter, the device                            
               comprising:                                                                                  
                      a radially expandable stent comprising a generally cylindrical wall                   
               surface and having a hollow bore extending longitudinally therethrough,                      
               wherein the generally cylindrical wall surface comprises a plurality of lateral              
               openings in the wall surface;                                                                
                      a coating comprising a polymer and a therapeutic substance disposed                   
               on the wall surface of the stent; and                                                        
                      a tubular outer layer comprising expanded, sintered PTFE tape wound                   
               about the outer surface of said stent.                                                       

                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                     
               unpatentability:                                                                             
                      Choi   US 4,131,648  Dec. 26, 1978                                                    
                      Myers  US 5,700,285  Dec. 23, 1997                                                    
                      Banas   US 5,749,880  May 12, 1998                                                    
                      Wijay   US 6,053,940  Apr. 25, 2000                                                   
                      Becker  US 6,117,165  Sept. 12, 2000                                                  
                      Michal  US 6,287,285 B1  Sept. 11, 2001                                               

                      The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                           
               1.  Claims 103-105, 107, and 113-117 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                        
               103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Myer and Choi.                                



                                                     2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013