Ex Parte Kelly et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                      Ex parte NICHOLAS PAUL KELLY, LEE CODEL LAWSON                                         
                            TARBOTTON, and KEVIN ANDREW GUDGION                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2020                                                
                                          Application 10/028,906                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 27, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and                                        
                MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  

                BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal involves claims 1-39, the only claims pending in this                      
                application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                          







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013