The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KENT K. FUNG,
DENNIS B. JENKINS, WENDY L. PING,
DANIEL E. WHEELER, and RAMESH HERNLEM
__________
Appeal 2007-2028
Application 11/058,1471
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: July 17, 2007
__________
Before ERIC GRIMES, NANCY J. LINCK, and
RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to animal
litter compositions. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
1 Application Serial No. 10/215,174 is also on appeal before the Board as
Appeal No. 2007-2814.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013