The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KLAUS HILBIG, MARCEL KAREL NELIS LIPLIJN, and
BIRGIT ZINT-SCHUESSLER
____________
Appeal 2007-2039
Application 10/619,656
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 30, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH,
Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7, all of the claims pending in
the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013