Appeal 2007-2047
Application 10/335,187
must indicate the appeal conference has been held and the Examiner’s
Answer has been reviewed, the conferees’ names and initials must appear on
the Examiner’s Answer.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we remand this appealed application to the jurisdiction
of the Examiner for action not inconsistent with our comments made above.
This application, by virtue of its special status, requires immediate
action by the Examiner. See MPEP § 708.01(d) (Rev. 5, August 2006). The
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences must be informed promptly of
any action affecting the appeal in this case, including reopening of
prosecution, allowance and/or abandonment of the application.
REMANDED
tf/ls
SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A.
P.O. BOX 2938
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013