Appeal 2007-2064
Application 10/116,562
E. CONCLUSION OF LAW
For the foregoing reasons, Appellants have not shown error in the
Examiner’s reasoning. Accordingly, the Examiner has supported a legal
determination of obviousness. The secondary considerations Appellants have
raised do not dislodge the Examiner’s determination that the claimed subject
matter is obvious. Accordingly, claims 1 and 3-9 are invalid under §103.
DECISION
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3-9 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a) (1) (iv).
AFFIRMED
vsh
FENWICK & WEST LLP
SILICON VALLEY CENTER
801 CALIFORNIA STREET
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013