The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HOLGER JURGENSEN,
GERHARD KARL STRAUCH
AND JOHANNES KAPPELER
____________
Appeal 2007-2095
Application 10/378,493
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: June 26, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3 and 12. Claims 4-11 are
the only other claims pending in this application, and the Examiner has
indicated that claim 11 is allowed while claims 4-10 are objected to as
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013