The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte WILLARD D. CARROLL, JR.
______________
Appeal 2007-2121
Application 10/705,083
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: August 23, 2007
_______________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicant appeals to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 3 through 6, 9, and 14 through 17 in the
Office Action mailed December 21, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a)
(2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claims 1 and 9 illustrate Appellant’s invention of an integrated driver
system, and is representative of the claims on appeal:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013