Ex Parte O - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                              ________________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                              ________________                                                     
                                     Ex parte JAMES PHILIP O’REILLY                                                
                                              ________________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2007-2132                                                    
                                            Application 09/761,041                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                              ________________                                                     
                                            Decided:  June 13, 2007                                                
                                              ________________                                                     
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                      
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                        
                rejection of claims 10, 12, and 13.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                          
                § 6.                                                                                               
                       We AFFIRM.                                                                                  
                       The Appellant claims a continuous process for stabilizing the main                          
                flow of bright beer which comprises treating the main flow with polyvinyl                          

                                                                                                                  



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013