The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte JAMES PHILIP O’REILLY ________________ Appeal 2007-2132 Application 09/761,041 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: June 13, 2007 ________________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 10, 12, and 13. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. We AFFIRM. The Appellant claims a continuous process for stabilizing the main flow of bright beer which comprises treating the main flow with polyvinylPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013