The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROSHI SHINRIKI,
KENJI MATSUMOTO, and
TORU TATSUMI
____________
Appeal 2007-2134
Application 10/311,880
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 22, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-15, the only claims that remain pending in this application. We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134. An oral hearing was
held on August 07, 2007.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013