The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK W. MCGLOTHLIN,
ERIC SCHMID AND
BRIAN P. WATSCHKE
____________
Appeal 2007-2135
Application 10/269,840
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 11, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
Opinion for the Board filed by Administrative Patent Judge WALTZ.
Opinion Dissenting filed by Administrative Patent Judge TIMM.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 34. Claims 35-38, the
only other claims in this application, stand withdrawn from consideration by
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013