The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANE CHANG, YUNWA W. CHEUNG,
CHARLES F. DIEHL, and JOSEPH M. VIHTELIC
____________
Appeal 2007-2154
Application 10/374,773
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-14, 16, 17, and 39-41, the only claims that remain pending in this
application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013