Ex Parte Kikuchi et al - Page 1


                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                             
                                      is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                  ____________                                                     
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                  ____________                                                     
                                       Ex parte NAOHIKO KIKUCHI and                                                
                                              AKIRA MINAKOSHI                                                      
                                                  ____________                                                     
                                              Appeal No. 2007-2156                                                 
                                            Application No. 10/606,358                                             
                                             Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                  ____________                                                     
                                             Decided:  August 22, 2007                                             
                                                  ____________                                                     

             Before PETER F. KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and                                                          
             LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
             SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1, 9,                 
             and 12.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.                                                    
                    The present invention relates to a studless tire which has superior                            
             performance on ice and snow.  According to Appellants, the tire has improved                          
             adhesion resistance, digging friction, scratching friction and abrasion resistance on                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013