The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte FILOMENA AUGUSTA MACEDO, and GREGORY AARON GRISSETT __________ Appeal 2007-2157 Application 11/000,692 Technology Center 1700 __________ Decided: July 31, 2007 __________ Before ERIC GRIMES, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a personal cleansing kit. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. BACKGROUND Implements such as woven and non-woven textiles, natural and synthetic sponges, and loofahs have “long been utilized to enhance speed and volume of lathering” for cleansing human skin (Specification 1).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013