Ex Parte Hagmeier et al - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-2169                                                                                        
                 Application 10/068,369                                                                                  

                        This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1                             
                 and 3-10.1  35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                               
                 § 6(b) (2002).                                                                                          
                        The invention is directed to a system for processing user transaction                            
                 data in accordance with loyalty rules.  Customer loyalty programs are well                              
                 known.  Specification, p. 1, para. [002].  The invention seeks to capture                               
                 customer data and process them in accordance with loyalty rules                                         
                 corresponding to a loyalty program.                                                                     
                        The claims are rejected as follows:                                                              
                 • Claims 1 and 3-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being                                       
                   unpatentable over Wong (US Patent 6,119,933) in view of Kawan (US                                     
                   Patent 6,889,198 B2).                                                                                 
                        We AFFIRM.                                                                                       
                        Appellants, in the Appeal Brief2, argue claims 1 and 3-10 as a group.                            
                 Accordingly, pursuant to the rules, the Board selects representative claim 1                            
                 to decide the appeal with respect to this rejection, and claims 3-10 will stand                         
                 or fall with claim 1.  37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (2006).  Claim 1 reads as                           
                 follows:                                                                                                
                        1. A computer system comprising                                                                  
                                a) a back-end computer having a first database for storing                               
                        loyalty rules and user data;                                                                     
                                b) a point of sale terminal including a front-end computer                               
                        having a second database for storing loyalty rules and for storing user                          
                                                                                                                        
                 1 Claim 2 has been canceled.                                                                            
                 2 Our decision will make reference to Appellants’ Appeal Brief (“Br.,” filed                            
                 Nov. 21, 2006) and the Examiner’s Answer (“Answer,” mailed Jan. 29,                                     
                 2007).                                                                                                  

                                                           2                                                             

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013