Ex Parte Jandasek et al - Page 2



           Appeal 2007-2173                                                                        
           Application 09/682,701                                                                  
                                    SUMMARY OF DECISION                                            
                 We REVERSE and ENTER A NEW GROUND OF REJECTION UNDER                              
           37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).                                                                   

                                        THE INVENTION                                              
                 The Appellants’ claimed invention is to a computer-implemented method             
           and system for supporting price negotiations (Specification 1:¶0002).  Claim 1,         
           reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal.                    
                       1. A computer system for generating a cost estimate,                        
                       the computer system configured to:                                          
                             receive input at a computing device specifying at                     
                       least one item to add to a cost estimate wherein the                        
                       computing device automatically adds a burden associated                     
                       with the at least one item to the cost estimate; and                        
                             output from the computing device a first value                        
                       chain for the at least one item selected by the computing                   
                       device based on one or more constituent component(s) of                     
                       the item(s) and supply tier wherein the value chain                         
                       includes an image and burden information for the at least                   
                       one item and each constituent component.                                    

                                        THE REJECTION                                              
                 The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:            
                  Foley                  US 5,249,120                Sep. 28, 1993                 
                  Evans                  US 6,775,647 B1             Aug. 10, 2004                 
                 The Appellants seek our review of the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-16         
           and 19-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Evans and Foley.                

                                                2                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013