This opinion is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FURUKAWA ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC. ____________ Appeal 2007-2176 Application 10/309,852 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: July 17, 2007 ____________ Before JAMESON LEE, RICHARD TORCZON, and SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The technical subject matter of this appeal is methods of drawing an optical fiber, and methods of assembling and preparing a preform for use in drawing an optical fiber. The examiner has rejected claims 17 and 20-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by prior art.1 The appellant (Furukawa) seeks review of the rejection. We affirm. 1 The examiner withdrew a separate rejection for indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112(2). Examiner's Answer (Ans.) 3.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013