Ex Parte Nie et al - Page 1

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                            
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                          Ex parte LI NIE, SUKH BASSI,                                                   
                                          CLODUALDO C. MANINGAT,                                                         
                                             and NORMAN WORTHY                                                           
                                                  Appeal 2007-2191                                                       
                                               Application 10/284,553                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1700                                                     
                                            Decided: September 13, 2007                                                  
                 Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                             
                 JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                 PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                                   
                 Examiner's refusal to allow claims 3 through 9, 29, and 30, all of the claims                           
                 pending in the above-identified application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant                             
                 to 35 U.S.C.  6.                                                                                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013