The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LI NIE, SUKH BASSI, CLODUALDO C. MANINGAT, and NORMAN WORTHY ____________ Appeal 2007-2191 Application 10/284,553 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 13, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's refusal to allow claims 3 through 9, 29, and 30, all of the claims pending in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013