Appeal 2007-2203
Application 10/311,659
Accordingly, we affirm the rejection of claims 28 and 31-34 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Krabatsch. Because Appellant has not
presented any additional substantive arguments with respect to claims 35
and 36 (Br. 12), we also affirm the rejection of claims 35 and 36 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Francisco in view of Shestok for the
reasons stated in the Examiner’s Answer.
ORDER
The rejection of claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
Francisco is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 29 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Francisco is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 28 and 31-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated by Krabatsch is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 35 and 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Krabatsch in view of Shestok is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(i)(iv).
AFFIRMED
cam
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013