The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BERNARD A. TRAVERSAT, LI GONG, KULDIPSINGH
PABLA, WILLIAM J. YEAGER, MOHAMED M. ABDELAZIZ,
MICHAEL J. DUIGOU, ERIC POUYOUL, JEAN-CHRISTOPHE
HUGLY, WILLIAM N. JOY, and MICHAEL J. CLARY
____________
Appeal 2007-2225
Application 10/054,809
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: August 31, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1-111, the only claims pending in this
application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013