The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte VICTOR ROSYNSKY, KENNETH W. BLAMBLE, BRENT C. BIBBEE, JERRY D. CORNELIUS, RALPH A. QUIGLEY, GARY A. GRAMICCIONI, MASAKI FUNABIKI, TUNEHISA KAWAUCHI, and TOMOYA TAKAHASHI ______________ Appeal 2007-2233 Application 10/228,754 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: August 30, 2007 _______________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 6 and 17 through 23 in the Office Action mailed October 18, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2005).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013