Appeal 2007-2234
Application 09/950,477
[20] Example 1 of Miranda is said to compare the ability of three
formulations to impart anti-skid or friction properties to paper (id.,
17:4-7).
[21] According to Example 1, the latex
JONCRYL 74® was used as a 48.5% dispersion in
water. The silica was used as a sol (41% by
weight silica in water). The amount of silica used
in the formulations is expressed as % by weight
dry silica. Formulation (1) is composed of 38 %
by weight silica, 14 % by weight glycerine, and
48 % by weight water. Formulation (2) is
composed of 37.6% by weight silica, 8 % by
weight diethylene glycol, 0.07 % by weight
biocide, and 54.3 % by weight water. Formulation
(3) is composed of 30.75 % by weight silica, 14.58
% by weight diethylene glycol, 10 % by weigh
[sic] JONCRYL 74®, 0.07% by weight biocide,
and 44.6 % by weight water.
The formulations were diluted with water in
order to facilitate the application of the
formulations. . . . [Id., 17:7-18.]
[22] The three formulations of Example 1 were said to show slide angle
losses through the winder (i.e., "skidding") of 3.3, 1.4 and 0.4 degrees,
respectively (id., 18:22-26; Table 1).
[23] Example 2 is said to show the printability indices of the three
formulations of Example 1 as averaging 35, 41 and 40, respectively,
with formulation 2 showing the highest average printability index (id.,
Table 2).
[24] Example 3 is said to compare the propensity of three formulations to
form deposits on tips of spray bars used in mill applications after one
hour of spraying (id., 19:26-30 and 20:4).
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013