The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN M. ROBERTSON, THOMAS DEMICHAEL,
and RAYMOND M. WALKER
____________
Appeal 2007-2257
Application 11/118,509
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 6, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 8-24. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.1
1 In rendering this decision, we have considered the Appellants' arguments
presented in the Briefs filed February 8, 2006, June 5, 2006, and January 10,
2007.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013