Appeal 2007-2324 Application 10/629,775 of a laundry dryer made by painting pressed steel plate “has a poor aesthetic quality from a design standpoint” because of its “simple flat surface” (id. at 3). “Moreover, even if the top cover is curved for better design, the top cover of steel plate shows wrinkles on its periphery” (id.). The Specification discloses a “top cover assembly for a laundry dryer[] that separates the top cover from the fire resistant housing, thereby allowing for a greater variety of materials and designs to be used on the top surface while still preventing fire taking place in the laundry dryer from spreading to the exterior” (id.). DISCUSSION 1. CLAIMS Claims 2-20 and 22-26 are pending and on appeal. Claim 26, the broadest claim on appeal, is representative and reads as follows: 26. A laundry dryer top cover assembly comprising: a top cover mounted on a side plate of a cabinet; a fire plate disposed between the side plate and the top cover for preventing fire from spreading outside the laundry dryer; and a cabinet holder configured to fasten the fire plate to the side plate wherein the cabinet holder includes a plurality of fastening pieces configured for insertion into the fire plate and the side plate. Thus, the assembly defined by claim 26 includes a top cover mounted on a side plate of a cabinet, with a fire plate between the top cover and side plate. The assembly also includes a “cabinet holder” that has a plurality of fastening pieces that insert into both the fire plate and side plate. It is well settled that “claims in an application are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification, and that 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013